If Greenspan said that, I would say it probably wasn't the best advice for some. However, that doesn't change the fact that Athur Davis & several house democrats thought it was more appropriate to defend Raines than heed the words of the OFHEO report on Fannie.
To be fair, Greenspan warned that GSE's could be a risk to taxpayers in 2004.
Fed Chief Warns of a Risk to TaxpayersBy EDMUND L. ANDREWS
Published: February 25, 2004
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9802E4DF123CF936A15751C0A9629C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all Alan Greenspan, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, warned on Tuesday that the nation's two big government-sponsored mortgage institutions pose a ''systemic risk'' that could cost taxpayers dearly.
Mr. Greenspan said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which buy up and repackage billions of dollars' worth of mortgages every year, have grown so rapidly and accumulated so much debt that they cannot adequately hedge against the risks of financial crises.
The Fed chairman said both companies, which hold about $2 trillion worth of obligations tied to home mortgages, have grown much faster than their competitors because investors think the federal government will bail them out in a crisis.
Mr. Greenspan said this ''implied subsidy'' has been a boon to the companies' shareholders but provided only modest benefits to homebuyers in the form of lower mortgage rates.
The danger, he said, is that the companies are using this implicit federal backstop to assume more risk and finance their expansion through increased debt.
''There is a general belief in the marketplace that these securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government,'' Mr. Greenspan testified at a hearing of the Senate Banking Committee.
Even though the federal government does not guarantee the securities of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, Mr. Greenspan suggested that their special status as ''government-sponsored enterprises'' and their huge size would make it difficult for Congress to avoid a bailout in the event of a financial calamity. ''It's basically creating an abnormality, which the system cannot close around, and the potential of that is a systemic risk in -- sometime in the future, if they continue to increase at the rate at which they are.''
Shares of both companies dropped after Mr. Greenspan's testimony. Fannie Mae shares fell $2.65, to $76.25. Freddie Mac slid $1.81, to $62.12.
Fannie Mae executives quickly lashed back at Mr. Greenspan, complaining that many of his criticisms were based on a Fed study that it called seriously flawed.
''We, of course, disagree with most of his conclusions,'' said Jayne Shontell, Fannie Mae's senior vice president for investor relations. ''We believe that the testimony does not appreciate the role of our mortgage portfolio and the impact of his proposal.''
Mr. Greenspan's lengthy and blunt criticisms are likely to provide new impetus for legislative proposals aimed at tightening the regulatory control over both companies.
Though Mr. Greenspan has criticized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the past, he expressed a greater degree of alarm about the potential risks posed by the companies, and he was insistent that Congress act ''sooner rather than later.''
Both companies have been under fire for more than a year, in part because both have admitted to a wide variety of questionable accounting practices.
Freddie Mac executives admitted in November that the company had understated earnings by $5 billion, a move they hoped would smooth out the company's long-term earnings trend and thus assuage investors. In October, Fannie Mae was forced to correct what it said were $1 billion in errors in its recent financial results.
Critics have complained for years that the two companies have been far less transparent in their financial reporting than ordinary financial institutions. But the larger concern voiced by Mr. Greenspan is that the companies may represent a huge and hidden financial liability that could at some point lead to a heavy costs for taxpayers.
The Bush administration has proposed transferring regulatory responsibility for the companies to the Treasury Department, which might then set new restrictions on their ability to issue debt or their requirements to keep larger amounts of capital in reserve.
Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee are trying to draw up a bipartisan plan that would create an independent regulatory group, overseen by top officials at the Treasury, the Fed and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Originally chartered by Congress, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were created to expand the pool of money for home mortgages at a time when few banks or savings institutions operated nationwide.
The two companies essentially buy up mortgages from local lenders and bundle the loans into large securities, which they then resell on financial markets. Today, Mr. Greenspan said, the companies stand behind about $4 trillion worth of mortgages -- about three-quarters of all single-family mortgages in the United States.
Mr. Greenspan emphasized that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had done a good job of managing their risk thus far. But he said their total volume of outstanding debt could soon exceed the debt of the federal government itself. That would make it hard for the government to avoid a bailout, he said.
''The scale itself has reinforced investors' perceptions that in the event of a crisis involving Fannie and Freddie, policy makers would have little alternative than to have taxpayers explicitly stand behind the G.S.E. debt,'' Mr. Greenspan said, referring to the debt of ''government sponsored enterprises.''
