Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: From Pro-tools to Auto-Tune, the new computer made musician  (Read 2167 times)
devineone
Sistah's (female posters)
Sr. Member
*

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1364


The sound of joyous laughter lifts me up.


« on: February 11, 2009, 11:43:46 AM »

A musician friend sent me this article today and I found it interesting.  I've actually known about pitch correction being used in the industry for years now.  I first heard of it back in 2002 when a studio musician told me about 'Antares recording pitch correction software which allows recording engineers to tweak vocals in the studio, they also have software that will allow this to happen during real time live performances.  He said everyone has used it from Whitney Houston to Faith Hill to Beyonce, to Mary J. Blige.
 
While there are advantages to this invention, (namely save studio time and money with re-recordings), there are also disadvantages when we have vocalist who rely on equipment to sing in tune and when the software is abused. It also tends to make the vocals sound 'unnatural and people listening have forgotten what the natural human voice sounds like.  The human voice shouldn't be robotized because it then loses the emotion... anyway the last thing pop music needs is emotionless vocals to go along with the already trite chords and melodies.  It's already dumbed down enough without adding to it.


"Auto-Tune: Why Pop Music Sounds Perfect"

Thursday, Feb. 05, 2009
Auto-Tune: Why Pop Music Sounds Perfect
By Josh Tyrangiel
If you haven't been listening to pop radio in the past few months, you've missed the rise of two seemingly opposing trends. In a medium in which mediocre singing has never been a bar to entry, a lot of pop vocals suddenly sound great. Better than great: note- and pitch-perfect, as if there's been an unspoken tightening of standards at record labels or an evolutionary leap in the development of vocal cords. At the other extreme are a few hip-hop singers who also hit their notes but with a precision so exaggerated that on first listen, their songs sound comically artificial, like a chorus of '50s robots singing Motown.

The force behind both trends is an ingenious plug-in called Auto-Tune, a downloadable studio trick that can take a vocal and instantly nudge it onto the proper note or move it to the correct pitch. It's like Photoshop for the human voice. Auto-Tune doesn't make it possible for just anyone to sing like a pro, but used as its creator intended, it can transform a wavering performance into something technically flawless. "Right now, if you listen to pop, everything is in perfect pitch, perfect time and perfect tune," says producer Rick Rubin. "That's how ubiquitous Auto-Tune is."

Auto-Tune's inventor is a man named Andy Hildebrand, who worked for years interpreting seismic data for the oil industry. Using a mathematical formula called autocorrelation, Hildebrand would send sound waves into the ground and record their reflections, providing an accurate map of potential drill sites. It's a technique that saves oil companies lots of money and allowed Hildebrand to retire at 40. He was debating the next chapter of his life at a dinner party when a guest challenged him to invent a box that would allow her to sing in tune. After he tinkered with autocorrelation for a few months, Auto-Tune was born in late 1996.

Almost immediately, studio engineers adopted it as a trade secret to fix flubbed notes, saving them the expense and hassle of having to redo sessions. The first time common ears heard Auto-Tune was on the immensely irritating 1998 Cher hit "Believe." In the first verse, when Cher sings "I can't break through" as though she's standing behind an electric fan, that's Auto-Tune--but it's not the way Hildebrand meant it to be used. The program's retune speed, which adjusts the singer's voice, can be set from zero to 400. "If you set it to 10, that means that the output pitch will get halfway to the target pitch in 10 milliseconds," says Hildebrand. "But if you let that parameter go to zero, it finds the nearest note and changes the output pitch instantaneously"--eliminating the natural transition between notes and making the singer sound jumpy and automated. "I never figured anyone in their right mind would want to do that," he says.

Like other trends spawned by Cher, the creative abuse of Auto-Tune quickly went out of fashion, although it continued to be an indispensable, if inaudible, part of the engineer's toolbox. But in 2003, T-Pain (Faheem Najm), a little-known rapper and singer, accidentally stumbled onto the Cher effect while Auto-Tuning some of his vocals. "It just worked for my voice," says T-Pain in his natural Tallahassee drawl. "And there wasn't anyone else doing it.".... (see link for remaining article it's long)

Logged

"A note can be as small as a pin or as big as the world, it depends on your imagination."

Thelonious Monk

cool breeze
Brothas (male posters)
Sr. Member
*

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 581



« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2009, 12:19:11 PM »

lol..Sorry but pop music in my humble opinion has never sounded "perfect"..

I don't care what they do in the studio..The live performance has always been the standard that I use..And if that sounds exactly like the record, without some imperfections or improvising? I always give the "artist" a zero..

Cher? T-Pain? lol..
Logged

Never be afraid to speak truth to power..

devineone
Sistah's (female posters)
Sr. Member
*

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1364


The sound of joyous laughter lifts me up.


« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2009, 10:18:11 PM »

I hear you CB, and you are right, hearing a live performance is the true test.  In some studio recording cases that Auto-tune kinda works.  A bass player friend of mine hipped me to Brittany Spears "Toxic", a few years back because he liked the bass part, even though the electric bass sounds like it was done on a synth in some parts. and with hardly the artistry that Stevie had when he used the synthesizer.  My friend wanted to re-orchestrate this entire tune.  Brittany's vocals aside, this little ditty doesn't sound half bad if you just isolate the bass part which is the only part worth listening to because it really drives the tune.  The arrangement isn't that bad either...I kinda like this pop tune and I'd never thought I'd hear me say I liked a tune recorded by Brittany.

But her vocals definitely show how the Auto-tune is used to alter the vocals for 'effect' and it sounds mechanical.  With more and more pop songs being pumped out like this where the vocals are made to sound mechanical, I guess the only real exposure the mainstream will get to hearing a raw voice is when they watch American Idol, something I don't watch.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2009, 11:37:04 PM by devineone » Logged

"A note can be as small as a pin or as big as the world, it depends on your imagination."

Thelonious Monk

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
 
Jump to: